Two-Part Question Model Answer
Question
In many countries, young people are choosing to move from rural areas to cities. Why are young people making this choice? Is this a positive or negative development overall?
Full Essay
Band 7.5 annotated answer
Each paragraph is followed by an examiner note explaining exactly what earns marks.
Introduction
The movement of young adults from the countryside to urban centres is one of the most significant demographic shifts occurring globally. This trend is driven primarily by economic opportunity and access to services, and while it generates real benefits for individual migrants, I believe the overall consequences — for rural communities in particular — are more negative than positive.
Both questions are signalled in the introduction ('driven primarily by economic opportunity' previews the why; 'more negative than positive' answers the second question). The verdict is qualified ('for rural communities in particular'), which signals nuanced analysis. This level of specificity in the introduction distinguishes Band 7+ from vaguer openers.
Body Paragraph 1
Young people relocate to cities for interconnected economic and social reasons. Cities concentrate employment opportunities, particularly in sectors such as technology, finance, and healthcare that rarely locate in rural areas. Beyond work, urban centres offer access to universities, cultural institutions, and diverse social networks that simply do not exist in smaller communities. In many developing countries, this pull is compounded by a push factor: mechanisation of agriculture and declining rural incomes have reduced the economic viability of remaining in the countryside, leaving young people with limited alternatives to migration.
Both pull and push factors are addressed, and the push factor is contextualised for developing countries — showing the candidate can think beyond generic explanations. The push-pull framework is an organised way to present causes without them feeling like a list. Addressing this question thoroughly is essential: many candidates write a strong paragraph on the second question and neglect the first.
Body Paragraph 2
While urban migration benefits individual migrants — who typically earn more, access better healthcare, and enjoy wider social opportunities — the broader effects are concerning. Rural communities that consistently lose their youngest, most educated residents face declining tax bases, school closures, and deteriorating infrastructure, creating a cycle of deprivation that makes remaining unattractive for successive generations. In cities, rapid population growth from internal migration strains housing markets and public services: the rapid expansion of informal settlements across South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa illustrates how urban infrastructure can be overwhelmed when migration outpaces planning capacity. The gains for individual migrants do not compensate for these systemic costs.
The positive for individuals is acknowledged before the negative verdict is argued — this shows intellectual honesty and earns marks for balanced reasoning. Two distinct negatives are developed (rural decline and urban pressure) with a specific regional example (South Asia, sub-Saharan Africa). 'Cycle of deprivation' and 'systemic costs' are strong Band 7+ phrases.
Conclusion
Young people move to cities because urban environments offer economic and social opportunities that rural areas cannot match. I believe this trend is, on balance, negative — not for the migrants themselves, but for the rural communities left behind and the urban systems receiving them. Addressing this imbalance requires sustained investment in rural infrastructure rather than simply managing the consequences of migration.
Both questions are answered explicitly in the conclusion — 'why' summarised in the first sentence, verdict in the second. The final sentence adds prescriptive value ('sustained investment in rural infrastructure') without introducing a full new paragraph-length argument. This closing moves beyond mere summary, which is a Band 7+ quality.
Comparison
Band 6 vs Band 7+ introduction
✗ Band 6
“Many young people are moving to cities nowadays. There are several reasons for this. In my opinion, this is mostly a negative development because it causes problems for both cities and rural areas.”
✓ Band 7+
“The movement of young adults from the countryside to urban centres is one of the most significant demographic shifts occurring globally. This trend is driven primarily by economic opportunity and access to services, and while it generates real benefits for individual migrants, I believe the overall consequences — for rural communities in particular — are more negative than positive.”
What makes the difference
The Band 6 introduction identifies no specific reasons and offers a vague verdict with no previewed reasoning ('problems for both cities and rural areas' could mean anything). The Band 7+ introduction identifies the driver of migration ('economic opportunity and access to services'), states a specific qualified verdict, and signals what the body paragraphs will argue — making it clear both questions will be answered.
Why it scores Band 7.5
Key strengths of this essay
Both questions answered with appropriate balance — the 'why' paragraph is as developed as the evaluation paragraph
Push-pull framework applied to the causes — organised and analytical rather than a simple list
Individual benefit acknowledged before the negative verdict is argued — shows intellectual honesty
Regional specificity (South Asia, sub-Saharan Africa) grounds the urban pressure argument
Other Task 2 model answers